Why Your Career Is Stalling: The Hidden Cost of Performing to Be Valued

Introduction

We don’t ask it out loud, but we feel it: Do I need to be more competitive, more agreeable—or less myself—to move forward?

“What if the real reason we’re stuck isn’t what we’re doing…it is why we’re doing it?”

Lately, I’ve been reflecting on the last few years of my career—specifically, on the quiet stagnation I hadn’t wanted to admit.

In the first half of my adult life, I was deeply driven by a need to excel—to be the top performer, the expert in the room, the person who stood out. I spoke with clarity. I led with confidence. I brought ideas that moved things forward. And for a while, that drive translated into accelerated career growth—into being seen, trusted, and valued.

But beneath the achievements was something quieter: a constant lens of comparison. A quiet judgment—of others, and of myself. That hunger brought results, yes—but not peace. Eventually, I began to wonder: Am I pursuing excellence because I love what I do? Or am I protecting something in me from ever feeling unseen again?

That question lingered. And eventually, something shifted.

It wasn’t burnout exactly. It was subtler than that—a slow erosion of momentum, a quiet dissonance I couldn’t ignore. I was becoming more self-aware, more attuned to my body, my soul, and my well-being. I could feel how harshly I’d been pushing others—and myself. I wasn’t just tired. I was performing in ways that no longer felt true.

The more I listened inward, the more I realized: I wasn’t acting from alignment. I was chasing outcomes, not values. And my values—empathy, creativity, fairness—had been buried beneath achievement.

The shift, then, wasn’t about giving up ambition. It was about trying to realign my work with what mattered most. I didn’t want to stop contributing—I just wanted to do it without betraying myself.

But in trying to realign, I began to disappear.

Eventually, I answered that earlier question by swinging to the other extreme. I began doing less—not just because I needed rest, but because I had internalized a new story: that striving was a trauma response. That excellence was performative. That trying too hard was a symptom of fear, not authenticity.

So, I dimmed my hunger. I traded sharpness for humility. And with it, something essential in me went quiet.

Looking back now, I see it clearly: I wasn’t wrong to soften. But I was wrong to split. I treated excellence and empathy as opposites—when really, I needed both. The striving wasn’t all wounding. It was also my way of contributing. Of being present. Of bringing something real.

This article is born from that realization.

It’s for anyone who’s tried to unlearn the wrong thing. Who mistook their gifts for flaws. Who’s ready to stop choosing between presence and power—and instead get ready to take their career to the next level by learning how to offer both.

It’s about the subtle ways we lose ourselves while trying to earn what was always meant to be ours—belonging, contribution, meaning. It’s about the difference between validation and true offering. Between people-pleasing and authentic presence. And it’s about how we begin to find our way back.

We’ll explore:

• Alfred Adler’s concept of inherent worth and social interest.

• The spectrum of contribution energy—from survival to sovereignty.

• The roots of over-functioning and emotional withdrawal.

• When validation becomes control or manipulation.

• How ikigai can help us realign our purpose with truth, not performance

And finally—how we learn to give, not to be needed, but to be real.

1. The Foundation: Adler on Inherent Worth & Contribution

Alfred Adler believed something radical: that every human being is born with equal worth. Not earned. Not proven. Not granted by approval or achievement—but inherent, inviolate, already whole. To Adler, psychological health wasn’t about dominance or success. It was about Gemeinschaftsgefühl—social interest, the felt sense of belonging to the human whole, and the natural desire to contribute to it.

And yet, for many of us, contribution becomes something else entirely. It turns into a currency we use to buy love or be valued. We offer help not from fullness, but from fear: “If I am useful, I won’t be left behind.” We strive not because we are moved, but because we are afraid that if we stop, we will vanish.

The tension lives here: between giving as an act of connection, and giving as an act of self-protection. Between presence and performance.

I didn’t learn to contribute because I felt whole. I learned to contribute to feel whole. To matter. To be enough. And for a time, it worked—until it didn’t. Until the praise faded, the roles changed, and I was left wondering: if I stop producing, do I still belong?

Adler’s insight offers both a challenge and a relief. Contribution matters. But it is not meant to secure worth—it is meant to express it. When we forget that, our gifts become traps. When we remember, they become joy.

Our work, then, is not just to give—but to know that we already are something worth giving from.

2. Why Contribution Isn’t Always Free

We like to imagine that helping is noble. That giving is good. That showing up—reliable, responsible, selfless—is the mark of maturity.

But contribution, for many of us, is not freedom. It’s survival.

“We don’t give because we’re full. We give because we’re afraid of what happens if we don’t.”

Afraid we’ll be forgotten. Left behind. Punished. Or simply… unnoticed.

The fear hides beneath familiar mantras:

“If I stop helping, I’ll disappear.”

“If I say no, I’ll lose everything.”

“If I’m not useful, I’m not worthy.”

And so, we become exceptional. Or accommodating. Or invisible. We build our identities around contribution—but only the kind that keeps us safe.

This kind of giving doesn’t feel like generosity. It feels like erosion. You say yes with a smile while something in you shrinks. You go above and beyond, and wonder why no one meets you there. You anticipate, absorb, offer. Until you’re a ghost wearing someone else’s name tag.

And still, it’s not enough.

Because no amount of survival-driven effort can create the thing it’s trying to earn: unconditional belonging.

When contribution is driven by fear, it’s never truly offered—it’s bartered. And the price is often your selfhood.

To heal, we must ask: Where am I giving from? Am I giving because I value myself—or because I’m afraid I won’t be valued? One liberates. The other binds.

The act may look the same. But the energy? The energy is everything.

There’s another version, less visible but just as entangled: the person who no longer gives—but still expects to be valued. They withdraw effort yet bargain for worth using past contributions, perceived status, charm, or identity. The message becomes: “You should treat me well because of who I am or what I once did—not what I’m offering now.”

This too is a pattern of hurt. Often born from early experiences of giving and not being recognized, it calcifies into entitlement masked as self-protection. But beneath it is still fear: “If I try and it’s not enough, I’ll break.”

3. Overfunctioning & Underfunctioning: Motivation Under Stress

When safety is uncertain, our nervous system does what it must to protect us. Some of us over-function. Some of us under-function. Neither is a flaw. Both are adaptations—coded into us when we were too young to name the threat.

Overfunctioners rush in. We fix, manage, plan, caretake. We feel responsible for outcomes that were never ours to carry. We anticipate needs before they’re spoken. We become dependable, competent, even impressive. But underneath is a quiet terror: If I stop holding everything together, I’ll be abandoned. If I’m not needed, I won’t be valued.

Underfunctioners, on the other hand, freeze. We collapse, withdraw, stay small. We defer decisions, avoid responsibility, and become passive not out of laziness, but shame. Somewhere we learned: If I try, I’ll fail. If I show up, I’ll be exposed. It’s safer to stay invisible than to risk not being enough.

These aren’t opposite personalities. They’re mirror wounds. Many of us shift between both, depending on the relationship or the season of life. One day we’re holding the world up. The next, we can’t get out of bed. It’s not inconsistency—it’s a system trying to protect itself from more pain.

What they share is this: a life organized around threat, not truth.

The work isn’t to force yourself to function “correctly.” It’s to notice the root. To ask, gently: What would I do if I didn’t feel afraid? If I believed I belonged?

From there, a different pattern can begin.

4. The Contribution Spectrum: From Survival to Sovereignty

Not all contribution comes from the same place. On the outside, it may look like generosity. Helpfulness. Presence. But underneath, the energy tells a different story.

We move along a spectrum.

At one end is withheld contribution—we don’t offer, not because we don’t care, but because we’ve learned it’s safer not to try. We say, “It’s not worth it.” But really, we mean: “I’m afraid it won’t matter.” This passivity can feel like apathy, but it’s often despair in disguise.

In the middle is validation-seeking. We contribute—but not from wholeness. We give to be seen. We overextend. We hustle for approval. We tie our value to our usefulness. And when we’re not thanked, we wilt or withdraw. The gift wasn’t truly free—it came with invisible strings.

At the far end is sovereign contribution. It says: “I give because it’s true for me to give.” It’s generous, but not self-erasing. It includes boundaries. It doesn’t chase gratitude or require applause. It feels steady. Sustainable. Alive.

Here’s the truth: the same exact action—making dinner, offering advice, helping a friend—can come from survival, performance, or sovereignty. The difference isn’t what we do. It’s the why beneath the motion.

We are always invited to ask: What part of me is giving right now?

The goal isn’t perfection. It’s awareness. And from awareness, choice. And from choice… freedom.

5. When Validation Becomes Manipulation

Most people who give to be seen aren’t trying to manipulate. They’re trying to survive.

They learned, often early, that being appreciated for who we are is something we must earn. That being helpful or pleasing kept them close to safety. So, they became the givers, the listeners, the ones who always showed up.

But over time, when that giving isn’t met—when there’s no reciprocity, no acknowledgment—something shifts. Resentment creeps in. Disappointment hardens. The gift begins to cost more than it gives.

Suddenly, our offering has conditions.

We may not say it aloud, but it lives beneath the surface:

“If I help you, you should appreciate me.”

“If I’m always there for you, you shouldn’t say no to me.”

“If I’m generous, you should stay.”

And when those expectations aren’t met, we don’t always express hurt. Sometimes, we withdraw. We go cold. We set “boundaries” that are really punishments. Or we give more—hoping it will finally earn what we’re too afraid to ask for directly.

This is the quiet shift: when giving becomes a trade. When we don’t just want connection—we want control. When our longing becomes a strategy.

But here’s the key insight: validation-seeking is not inherently manipulative. It’s human. It often begins in trauma, not malice. But without awareness, it can become extractive.

Healing means noticing when we give with strings—and daring to untie them.

Because true generosity requires freedom. And freedom only comes when we know we are enough, even if nothing is returned.

6. Ikigai: A Model of Aligned Contribution

There’s a quiet joy that emerges when we give from the center of ourselves—not to earn value, but to express it. The Japanese concept of ikigai gestures toward this place. It asks: What makes life worth living for you?

Ikigai lives at the intersection of four truths:

• What you love

• What you’re good at

• What the world needs

• What you can be recognized or compensated for

When these overlap, contribution becomes more than effort—it becomes meaning.

But ikigai isn’t always grand. It doesn’t require a platform, a paycheck, or a big life mission. Some people find their purpose in tending a garden. In raising children. In perfecting the art of a single cup of tea. The essence of ikigai is inner validation—not external applause. It’s the feeling that your being and your doing are in harmony.

Too often, we settle in just one quadrant. We do what we’re good at but no longer love. We pursue what the world needs but lose ourselves in the giving. We follow passion with no anchor, or we stay where we’re safe and invisible.

Ikigai isn’t about chasing the perfect job or passion project. It’s about integration. It’s where presence meets purpose—not performance.

You don’t need to be healed to begin. But alignment can heal you. Because when your gifts match your essence, and your contribution reflects your values, you stop fracturing yourself to survive. You start becoming whole again—through what you give.

Ikigai doesn’t ask you to sacrifice yourself. It asks you to bring yourself.

7. The Shadow of Contribution—When Helping Hurts

Most of us want to help. It feels good to be needed, to ease someone’s pain, to offer something useful. But not all helping is healing.

Sometimes, contribution becomes a mask—a way to earn belonging, avoid conflict, or outrun our own feelings of inadequacy. We call it generosity. But it’s often something else.

Adler believed true contribution arises from equality—not from trying to fix others, dominate through care, or earn value through usefulness. But when we’re wounded, our giving can take on shadows:

• Inferiority compensation: helping to feel superior or worthy

• Approval-seeking: pleasing so others won’t leave

• Conditional generosity: giving to obligate or control

The overfunctioner often becomes the “glue” in relationships—but that glue binds too tightly. They do too much, anticipate too much, and often feel resentful that no one meets them with the same intensity.

The underfunctioner may seem passive or unreliable, but they’re playing a role too: they rely on the giver to stay safe, to stay small. Together, they form a loop—caretaker and cared-for, martyr and ghost. Burnout on one side, shame on the other.

This is the shadow of contribution: when it stops being a bridge and becomes a burden. When it protects connection at the cost of truth.

Helping isn’t always love. And love doesn’t always mean helping.

Sometimes, the most honest gift is to stop performing—and start relating.

8. Sidebar: Reciprocity vs. Coercion

At the heart of healthy contribution is reciprocity—mutual, voluntary, grounded in presence. But when fear and performance enter the picture, giving can become something else: coercion in disguise.

True reciprocity feels spacious. It’s chosen, not extracted. There’s no scoreboard, no invisible ledger. It lives in the small exchanges—time, care, attention—that flow freely between people who trust they’re already enough.

But coerced contribution sounds generous while hiding unspoken terms. It’s the “no problem at all” offered through gritted teeth. The favor given with the silent hope of being owed. The “boundary” that’s really a punishment for not meeting our unvoiced expectations.

We end up confused—by our own fatigue, by our disappointment. “Why do I feel used when I’m the one giving?”

Because it wasn’t freely offered. It was a test. A bid for closeness disguised as service.

Adler reminds us: contribution should affirm equality, not enforce dependency. When giving becomes a strategy for control—or when we withhold to prove a point—we’re no longer relating. We’re bargaining.

And most painful of all? We may not even realize we’re doing it. Because this pattern is so familiar, it can feel like love—or like respect.

But real value doesn’t manipulate. Real value gives without keeping score—and receives without guilt.

If our contribution comes with a leash, it’s not value—it’s survival.

And survival is not a sin. But it’s not the destination, either.

9. Healing the Pattern: From Survival to Self-Expression

You are not broken.

Your patterns—overgiving, withdrawing, striving—were responses.

They formed in the spaces where your needs went unmet, where your voice went unheard.

They kept you safe.

But safety is not the same as wholeness.

Healing begins when you stop asking your survival strategies to bring you joy.

For Overfunctioners

Who take on too much—too soon, too often—

Who disappear behind doing, fixing, managing—

Start here:

Learn to say no—even when you still feel guilty.

Rest without explaining yourself.

Let go of being “needed” as identity.

“You are not only worthy when useful. Your value is not a performance—it is presence.”

For Underfunctioners

Who freeze, defer, shrink—

Who feel incapable, not because they are, but because shame said so—

Start here:

Reclaim your agency, one small step at a time.

Practice showing up—even imperfectly.

Your freeze is not failure. It’s protection.

You are not lazy. You are thawing.

And that is sacred work.

For Validation-Seekers

Who give to be chosen, please to be safe—

Who feel invisible unless they’re exceptional—

Start here:

Name the wound beneath the offering.

Ask: “If I didn’t need their approval, would I still give this?”

Separate your worth from your output.

Learn to offer without needing control—

And to receive without shame.

For Withholders

Who expect to be valued without offering—

Who carry past hurts like proof that effort isn’t worth it—

Who feel asked too much and seen too little—

Start here:

Begin again, even if it feels beneath you.

Let contribution be a choice, not a burden.

Offer something—not to earn value, but to remember your own aliveness.

You are not too good to give.

You are too precious to disappear.

Your worth is not in your status or past—

It lives in what you choose to bring now.

Healing is not a clean shift from fear to fullness.

It’s a slow relearning of self-trust.

It’s trying again—quietly, bravely—after years of hiding.

Contribution becomes sacred when it flows from expression, not erosion.

From desire, not desperation.

You are not what you produce.

You are what you choose to offer—freely, truthfully, and without apology.

10. Conclusion

We come into the world whole.

But along the way, we forget. We start performing for belonging, giving to be needed, striving to be seen. We confuse usefulness with worth. We disappear behind roles that make others comfortable—but leave us invisible.

The truth is simpler. And harder.

You were never meant to earn your value. Only to remember it.

When you root yourself in that knowing, contribution changes. It stops being a burden and becomes a joy. No longer a trade. No longer a performance. Just the natural expression of who you are.

You’re not what you produce. You’re not what others praise or reject.

You are what you offer—freely, wholly, presently.

Even if no one claps. Even if no one notices right away.

The act itself is enough. You are enough.

When you contribute from the truth of your worth—not to impress, not to avoid—but because it feels right, something changes. You stop waiting for recognition and start creating meaning. Over time, that quiet integrity is noticed. Not always loudly—but steadily. People begin to trust your presence.

“You become known—not just for what you’ve done, but for who you consistently choose to be. Contribution stops being a task. It becomes your signature.”

You see a need and respond.

Not to prove. Not to impress. But because it’s true to who you are.

That’s how real leaders are born—

Not through control, perfection, or box-checking,

but through the quiet confidence of someone who knows they have something real to give.

They’re the ones communities turn to without being asked.

The ones promoted—not for playing the game, but for raising the bar.

The ones customers return to—not for discounts or favors,

but because the value they offer is unmistakable, and the trust they carry is earned.

This cycle—of forgetting, performing, and remembering—is not just personal. It’s universal. It’s the very arc of As I See You, I See Myself.

In the novel, Sabir carries the same weight: the belief that he must achieve or disappear, that he must give in a way others accept to feel worthy of love or place. He runs. He performs. He nearly disappears. But when he finally stops—when he lets go of earning and begins to offer from truth—something begins to shift.

Will he stay? Will he find love—not through sacrifice, but by being valued for his truth and self-expression?

You’ll have to read to find out.

But know this: his story is ours.

And the remembering has already begun.

To read more or get notified when the novel is released, Join the circle →